Practice Areas

Blog

DUI, Traffic and Criminal Law Defense

view all

Firm News

Former Virginia Beach deputy sentenced in DUI crash case
Posted on 6/27/2010

Shore Drive speed limit lowered to 35
Posted on 6/4/2010

Child Abuse Charges for Virginia Beach DUI Driver with Kids in Car
Posted on 5/31/2010

DUI Conviction for Former Virginia Beach Police Officer
Posted on 5/28/2010

Felony charges for "sexting" Franklin teens
Posted on 5/20/2010

Are alcoholic energy drinks to blame for Virginia Beach DUI death?
Posted on 4/30/2010

Virginia Beach city employee charged with DUI after hit-and-run crash
Posted on 4/30/2010

Bond revoked for man accused in Virginia Beach DUI hit-and-run
Posted on 4/26/2010

Richmond to Install Red-Light Cameras
Posted on 4/22/2010

St. Patty’s sobriety checkpoints lead to 9 Virginia Beach DUI arrests
Posted on 3/27/2010

View All

Firm Library

DUI, Traffic and Criminal Law Defense

More Info

Blog Category:

DUI, Traffic and Criminal Law Defense

11/17/2008
Allan
Comments (0)

DUI Cases II

DUI CASES CONTINUE TO GIVE US CHALLENGES. OH, I KNOW, TV COMMENTATORS ARE AGHAST THAT ANYONE WOULD TRY TO DEFENDANT A PERSON CHARGED WITH A DUI OFFENSE. BUT THIS IS THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN PLACE IN THE USA. BUT I DIGRESS.

I NOTED IN AN EARLIER NOTE ON THIS SUBJECT THAT THESE CASES ARE ODD AND UNUSUAL. THE JUDGE IS PRECONDITIONED TO FIND THE DEFENDANT GUILTY. THAT OLD PRESUMPTION OF GUILT DOCTRINE, BUT IN THESE CASES THE PRESUMPTION IS ON STEROIDS. YOU NEVER KNOW WHERE YOUR VICTORIES WILL COME FROM. I HAVE CLIENTS ASK ME"WHAT IS YOUR STRATEGY?" FRANKLY I DON'T KNOW, JUST GIVE THEM A TOUGH TIME.

I REPRESENTED A CLIENT WHO RAN INTO A TELEPHONE POLE AND HAD BEEN DRINKING. HE HIT HIS HEAD AND GOT CUT. THE FIRST OFFICER ON THE SCENE CALLED AN AMBULANCE BECAUSE THE DRIVER WAS HURT. THE OFFICER NOTED THE ODOR OF ALCOHOL, AND SUSPECTED A DUI CASE. THE PARAMEDICS ARRIVED TREATED THE DRIVER AND GAVE HIM AN IV. THEY THEN TOOK HIM TO THE HOSPITAL FOR EMERGENCY TREATMENT. A BLOOD SAMPLE WAS TAKEN AND THE ANALYSIS SHOWED A B.A.C OF .25% ( VERY DRUNK). HOWEVER, AT THE CLOSE OF THE EVIDENCE, WE POINTED OUT THAT NO BODY KNOWS WHAT WAS IN THE IV. WAS IT PAIN KILLERS, A SEDATIVE, OR ALCOHOL? THIS KEPT THE TEST RESULT OUT OF THE CASE, AND, AS A RESULT, MY CLIENT GOT A VERY FAVORABLE RESULT.

NOW SOME MIGHT HAVE ISSUES WITH THIS SORT OF BUSINESS, BUT IT IS OUR SYSTEM. IN THE OLD SOVIET UNION ALL THAT WAS NECESSARY WAS THE BRINGING OF THE CHARGE. NOT WHAT WE WANT HERE. SO YOU LAWYER MUST BE ON HIS TOES, BEFORE AND DURING TRIAL BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW.


Labels:
Bookmark and Share


There are no comments.

Post a comment

Post a Comment to "DUI Cases II"

To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", hit "Post Message."

Username:*

Password:*

Register for an account

Message:

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

For security purposes, please enter the graphic text in the box below: [hit F5 if you can not read the text]