Practice Areas

Blog

DUI, Traffic and Criminal Law Defense

view all

Firm News

Manslaughter charges for three DUI related Norfolk car crash deaths?
Posted on 8/26/2010

Virginia Beach driver accused of DUI deaths in crash pleads guilty
Posted on 8/25/2010

Former Virginia Beach deputy sentenced in DUI crash case
Posted on 6/27/2010

Shore Drive speed limit lowered to 35
Posted on 6/4/2010

Child Abuse Charges for Virginia Beach DUI Driver with Kids in Car
Posted on 5/31/2010

DUI Conviction for Former Virginia Beach Police Officer
Posted on 5/28/2010

Felony charges for "sexting" Franklin teens
Posted on 5/20/2010

Are alcoholic energy drinks to blame for Virginia Beach DUI death?
Posted on 4/30/2010

Virginia Beach city employee charged with DUI after hit-and-run crash
Posted on 4/30/2010

Bond revoked for man accused in Virginia Beach DUI hit-and-run
Posted on 4/26/2010

View All

Firm Library

DUI, Traffic and Criminal Law Defense

More Info

Blog Category:

DUI, Traffic and Criminal Law Defense

11/17/2008
Brian
Comments (0)

UVA Professor: Vague Traffic Laws Invite Discrimination

Kim Forde-Mazrui, a law professor at the University of Virginia, argues in the Vanderbilt Law Review that our state's legal system needs to be reformed to give constitutional protection to motorists.  He argues that vaguely written laws, like Virginia's traffic laws, "give police the authority to stop, interrogate, search, and arrest whomever they choose for any reason."

Specifically, Forde-Mazrui believes that police are targeting racial minorities and young motorists. 

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.  However, if police officers make an arrest, they are able to validly search the area within the immediate control of the motorist.  As long as the initial arrest is valid, a court reviewing the officer's actions will find that the search was also valid.

Forde-Mazrui's argument is that the discretion given to police officers during a traffic stop lead to a discriminatory application of the law.  For instance, an officer might be more likely to ticket a racial minority or young driver in a traffic stop than he would be to ticket a white, middle-class adult.  This discretion, he argues, dictates that minorities and young drivers are effectively limited to lower speeds than white, middle class adults, because the officer who might ticket not the middle class driver for exceeding the speed limit by 10 mph is likely to ticket the minority for exceeding it by only 5 mph.

To remedy this problem, Forde-Mazrui suggests limiting the authority of police officers by requiring them to justify enforcement practices that have a discriminatory impact, requiring higher enforcement rates, and precluding enforcement of minor traffic violations.

A full copy of Forde-Mazrui's article can be found here.



Labels:
Bookmark and Share


There are no comments.

Post a comment

Post a Comment to "UVA Professor: Vague Traffic Laws Invite Discrimination"

To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", hit "Post Message."

Username:*

Password:*

Register for an account

Message:

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

For security purposes, please enter the graphic text in the box below: [hit F5 if you can not read the text]