Practice Areas

Blog

Nursing Home Abuse

view all

Personal Injury and Automobile Accidents

view all

Medical Malpractice

view all

DUI, Traffic and Criminal Law Defense

view all

Business Litigation

view all

General Observations

view all

General Observations

view all

General

view all

Firm News

Three High School Students Killed in a Car Crash in Virginia Beach

Young Volunteer Firefighter Killed in Crash

Former Virginia Tech Quarterback Found Guilty of DUI

Four Deaths on Virginia 151 Prompted Change

Fossella Found Guilty of Misdemeanor Charges of DUI in Virginia

Study Reveals 13% of Seniors Report Mistreatment

Grant Helps the Elderly Avoid Nursing Homes

Driver Convicted of DUI Death Arrested Again on DUI Charge

Nursing home patient's death cause 'undetermined'

Drive Safe Hampton Roads to provide free child safety seat checks

View All

Firm Library

Nursing Home Abuse

More Info

Personal Injury and Automobile Accidents

More Info

Medical Malpractice

More Info

DUI, Traffic and Criminal Law Defense

More Info

Divorce

More Info

General

More Info

Weisberg Law Blog

Weisberg Law Blog
Blog Category:

DUI, Traffic and Criminal Law Defense

    1/29/2008
    Brian
    Comments (0)

    UVA Professor: Vague Traffic Laws Invite Discrimination

    Kim Forde-Mazrui, a law professor at the University of Virginia, argues in the Vanderbilt Law Review that our state's legal system needs to be reformed to give constitutional protection to motorists.  He argues that vaguely written laws, like Virginia's traffic laws, "give police the authority to stop, interrogate, search, and arrest whomever they choose for any reason."

    Specifically, Forde-Mazrui believes that police are targeting racial minorities and young motorists. 

    The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.  However, if police officers make an arrest, they are able to validly search the area within the immediate control of the motorist.  As long as the initial arrest is valid, a court reviewing the officer's actions will find that the search was also valid.

    Forde-Mazrui's argument is that the discretion given to police officers during a traffic stop lead to a discriminatory application of the law.  For instance, an officer might be more likely to ticket a racial minority or young driver in a traffic stop than he would be to ticket a white, middle-class adult.  This discretion, he argues, dictates that minorities and young drivers are effectively limited to lower speeds than white, middle class adults, because the officer who might ticket not the middle class driver for exceeding the speed limit by 10 mph is likely to ticket the minority for exceeding it by only 5 mph.

    To remedy this problem, Forde-Mazrui suggests limiting the authority of police officers by requiring them to justify enforcement practices that have a discriminatory impact, requiring higher enforcement rates, and precluding enforcement of minor traffic violations.

    A full copy of Forde-Mazrui's article can be found here.

    Read More about "UVA Professor: Vague Traffic Laws Invite Discrimination"


    Labels:

Comments

There are no comments.

Post a comment

Post a Comment to "UVA Professor: Vague Traffic Laws Invite Discrimination"

To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", enter your username and password, and hit "Post Message."

Username:

Password:

Register for an account

Message:

Ask an AttorneyAsk an Attorney
Free Consultation

Name:

Phone:

Email:

Tell us more:


Weisberg & Zaleski, P.C.
112 College Place
Norfolk, VA 23510

Toll Free: (800) 690-0235
Phone: (757) 622-7740
Fax: (757) 533-9223

Map / Directions

FAQs

Personal Injury and Automobile Accidents

Medical Malpractice

DUI, Traffic and Criminal Law Defense

Business Litigation

Divorce

View All